|
|  |
 |
 |
| Why Business Staff, Inc.? | |
Read the quotes below and you will see:
- Staff Leasing lowers your total costs
- You can offer benefits that you otherwise could not afford
- You can concentrate on your business and we worry about your employees!
|  |

- Wall Street Journal. "...avoid payroll, insurance and tax hassles. The staff are happier, too, because they get better benefits."
- Investors Daily. "Many Businesses have found freedom from paperwork and administration of the employee's benefits, plus the cost savings."
- Kiplinger Letter. "...to reduce employee benefits costs, unemployment insurance and paperwork."
- Forbes. "Why the boom? It lowers costs for firms."
- Fortune. "Employees are usually more enthusiastic about the arrangement."
- USA Today. "...appeals to the small to medium size firms who want to be free from bookkeeping chores and labor problems."
- Small Business Administration. "We see employee leasing as providing benefits to employers at a lower cost."
- Internal Revenue Service. "We also recognize that an employee of a legitimate employee leasing company can have access to better benefit packages, delivered economically."
- PH Tax Review. "Employee Leasing remains a good cost cutter and time saver for professional corporations."
- Los Angeles Times. "The number one reason for leasing is so a company can offer benefits that they would otherwise not be able to afford."
- American Medical News. "With Staff Leasing firms, which employ hundreds of workers, an MD can get lower prices for medical packages. And the firm handles the administrative work, saving time and money."
- Business Week. "Small businesses can benefit from firing all of their employees - and immediately rehiring them through employee leasing."
- Financial Manager. "Besides freeing the employer from administrative burdens, leasing reduces or even eliminates the overhead expense of maintaining a personnel management staff. The leasor usually has better trained human resource workers on its staff than a single company could

|
|
|
|